Jamie Clubb Snr Member
Number of posts : 296 Age : 47 Job/hobbies : Coach/Writer Humor : Groucho Marx, Tony Hancock, Bill Cosby, Billy Connolly, Paul Merton, Ricky Gervais Registration date : 2008-06-20
| Subject: Pseudohistory Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:24 pm | |
| Despite the growing pace of pseudohistory there really isn't a lot out there addressing it in the same way that scientists and science-supporters have taken on the mantle of modern scepticism to do battle with pseudoscience. However, here are some good links: http://www.skepdic.com/pseudohs.html - The Skeptic Dictionary offers a far better definition of pseudohistory than Wikipedia does. It is far from perfect. For example, I distinguish faction (overt and honest intentional mixture of fact and fiction for entertainment purposes only) from pseudohistory. http://www.cfar.umd.edu/~waksman/fantek/bios/rocky-pseudohist.html - Here is a great piece I found from just googling the term. | |
|
undercover sceptic Admin
Number of posts : 520 Age : 50 Location : N.E. England Job/hobbies : reading popular science, research. Humor : Dry Registration date : 2008-06-18
| Subject: Re: Pseudohistory Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:48 pm | |
| How about a pseudohistory red flags article or even just aselection of the best red flags for us philistines jamie?
Den. | |
|
Jamie Clubb Snr Member
Number of posts : 296 Age : 47 Job/hobbies : Coach/Writer Humor : Groucho Marx, Tony Hancock, Bill Cosby, Billy Connolly, Paul Merton, Ricky Gervais Registration date : 2008-06-20
| Subject: Re: Pseudohistory Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:04 am | |
| Hi Den,
Yes, I think it needs at least one article. I don't want to get obsessive, but what started out as fun turned into an annoyance and now I think it is a genuine threat. It just shocks me the way historical "hacks" don't consult their sources properly or even stop to consider the logic.
Cheers, Jamie | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Pseudohistory | |
| |
|